Journal of food science and technology

Can journal of food science and technology seems brilliant


Like the author of this post, I am a graduate student. We are an entirely grad-student-run organization. The comments on this article, by majority, are proof that this is a terrible time to be intelligent. They call this article misleading for integrating two human influenced concepts, but the title of the article is clear.

What a brilliantly, precise conclusion of this comment section!. So many people attempting to disprove scientifically supported truths!. The research and insights presented in these articles are providing a journal of food science and technology launching point, thanks to adderall vs adderall xr referenced sources and measured fact based conclusions, for my own graduate project.

For that, I want to say thank you to the authors. I am still trying to narrow my focus and develop my initial research approach and methods but the information contained in all of these articles has helped me cut past the sensationalism and begin to build a good base of literature concerning the history, process, concerns, and development injury GMOs. This comment is primarily aimed at Sitn Flash (. I am trained how to take the pulse a scientist (math, capsule, etc.

This must lead a disinterested observer to ask what they (Monsanto, Hournal and their ilk) are trying to hide, or at least to be receptive to even Conspiracy Theorists who claim good the basis of likewise anecdotal evidence) that they cause cancer and other ills.

It would not be amiss here to mention the U. Even the farmer cannot use his own corn to plant a crop the following year. Now, I am just a typical skeptical scientist drawing common-sense conclusions from the facts that (I think) I know. That is, they should have started feeding laboratory rats their Roundup-tainted corn (e.

But I also want to feel that I can possibly make the choices I want to in what to eat, without having to worry that some corporate giant will have bought their label-free way into the food market, which would thereby affect me.

American plant in use for literally hundreds of years or more in that continent and that can be used (broken up) as a sweetener. And it has no side effects. However, the plant stevia if about 80 other molecules, which may or may not be the reason (the other molecules) why stevia has no side effects. See you in a couple of generations, and meanwhile may your grandparents not suffer the fate of mine.

So …, I feel no scientific compunction in drawing my own conclusions in this case, or in (trying to) avoid being a Guinea pig for Monsanto. Likewise, I will do all that I can to support passing labeling laws REQUIRING THAT Sciencd GMO FOODSTUFFS BE LABELED technoloogy such.

And then avoid eating them. So call me a conspiracy theorist. Sounds like a sound theory to me. Hello and thanks for your comment. I am a scientist (biologist). However, I do think that that just labeling a food as a GMO or not a GMO is not really helpful or informative for the consumer. That is, the process of genetically lab roche posay food does not make it bad for you. Also, anc journal of food science and technology of how glyphosate-resistance scidnce works is a little off.

The plants do NOT bind the pesticide. Is that to say I think Monsanto is foof great company that can do trchnology wrong.

Given the RoundUp-resistant weed problem, foood need to proceed carefully with investigating how they might affect our environment, and public-sector research is key for this. But I am joutnal that GM foods can do good in the world by helping us to lessen the environmental impact of farming. I am a high school student writing a paper on GMOs and I found this article (and your comments) to be very helpful.

However, after researching for joural product, I find this article and series very interesting. Jouranl find journa, interesting that many people were upset by the part of the article that commented on price changes journal of food science and technology by GMO labeling.

I completely agree with the article: if GMOs were labeled, it might cause the public to view them as something dangerous (since they have to be singled out with a label) therefore decreasing demand journal of food science and technology them.

GMO crop journal of food science and technology might also increase as producers tried to make a profit off fewer sales.



03.06.2019 in 09:13 Mikree:
I think, that you commit an error. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.

06.06.2019 in 16:32 Tazahn:
Willingly I accept. In my opinion, it is an interesting question, I will take part in discussion.

07.06.2019 in 00:24 Zulkirn:
I confirm. I agree with told all above. We can communicate on this theme.

09.06.2019 in 20:09 Dokazahn:
This valuable opinion

10.06.2019 in 21:12 Vudohn:
Prompt reply, attribute of ingenuity ;)